Academic Integrity and Publication Ethics Policy
Document Control
Policy Version: 3.0
Effective Date: February 6, 2025
Last Updated: February 6, 2025
Review Cycle: Annual
Document Owner: RSYN RESEARCH LLP Ethics Committee
Classification: Public Policy Document
Approved By: Board of Directors, RSYN RESEARCH LLP
Executive Summary
RSYN RESEARCH LLP maintains unwavering commitment to academic integrity across its entire publication portfolio. This comprehensive policy document establishes the framework for preventing, detecting, and addressing academic misconduct while promoting ethical research practices. Our approach combines cutting-edge technological solutions with rigorous human oversight to ensure the highest standards of scholarly publishing.
Foundational Principles
Core Values
RSYN RESEARCH LLP's publication ethics framework rests upon four fundamental pillars:
Integrity: Maintaining truthfulness and honesty in all research communications
Transparency: Ensuring clear documentation of research methodologies and findings
Accountability: Establishing clear responsibility for research conduct and outputs
Fairness: Providing equitable treatment in the review and publication process
Policy Scope
This policy governs all scholarly content published under RSYN RESEARCH LLP's auspices, encompassing:
Peer-reviewed journal articles across all disciplines
Academic books, monographs, and edited volumes
Conference proceedings and abstracts
Special issues and supplements
Digital content and multimedia presentations
Research datasets and supplementary materials
Preprints and postprints
Technical reports and white papers
Comprehensive Definition of Academic Misconduct
Categories of Plagiarism
Textual Plagiarism
Textual plagiarism manifests in several forms, each requiring specific detection and remediation approaches:
Verbatim Copying: Direct reproduction of text without proper attribution
Mosaic Plagiarism: Combining text from multiple sources without appropriate citation
Paraphrase Plagiarism: Rewording without substantial intellectual contribution
Translation Plagiarism: Converting text from one language without acknowledging the original
Technical Plagiarism: Copying specialized terminology or methodological descriptions
Severity Thresholds:
| Category | Word Count | Similarity Percentage | Action Required |
| Minor | <100 | <10% | Author Warning |
| Moderate | 100-500 | 10-25% | Revision Required |
| Severe | >500 | >25% | Immediate Rejection |
Data and Visual Plagiarism
This category encompasses unauthorized use or manipulation of:
Research data and datasets
Graphs and charts
Scientific images and photographs
Technical drawings and diagrams
Statistical analyses and results
Detection Parameters:
Image similarity analysis using AI-powered tools
Statistical pattern recognition
Dataset fingerprinting
Metadata analysis
Visual element comparison
Conceptual Plagiarism
Misappropriation of:
Detection and Prevention Framework
Technological Infrastructure
RSYN RESEARCH LLP employs a multi-layered detection system:
Primary Detection: iThenticate and Turnitin for text similarity
Secondary Detection: Custom AI algorithms for pattern recognition
Tertiary Detection: Specialized tools for discipline-specific content
Human Oversight
A robust review process involving:
Managing Editors: Initial screening and triage
Subject Matter Experts: In-depth content analysis
Technical Reviewers: Methodology and data verification
Ethics Committee: Complex case evaluation
Investigation and Enforcement
Investigation Protocol
Standard Operating Procedure:
Receipt and logging of allegation
Preliminary evidence gathering
Author notification and response period
Expert panel review
Decision formulation
Implementation of sanctions
Sanctions Framework
Progressive Enforcement Model:
| Violation Level | Primary Sanction | Secondary Measures | Duration |
| Level 1 | Written Warning | Ethics Training | One-time |
| Level 2 | Temporary Ban | Institutional Notification | 1-2 Years |
| Level 3 | Permanent Ban | Legal Action | Indefinite |
Prevention and Education
Author Resources
Comprehensive support including:
Online training modules
Writing guidelines
Citation management tools
Language editing services
Ethical writing workshops
Editorial Support
Continuous professional development through:
Appeals and Dispute Resolution
Appeals Process
Structured approach including:
30-day appeal window
Independent review panel
Evidence reassessment
Stakeholder consultation
Final determination
Dispute Resolution
Multiple resolution pathways:
Special Considerations
Emerging Technologies
Guidelines for:
Cultural Considerations
Accommodations for:
Policy Implementation
Roles and Responsibilities
Clear delineation of duties for:
Board of Directors
Ethics Committee
Editorial Teams
Technical Staff
Support Personnel
Review and Updates
Regular evaluation through:
Annual policy review
Stakeholder feedback
Industry benchmarking
Technology assessment
Legal compliance check
Supporting Documentation
Authorship declaration
Conflict of interest disclosure
Data availability statement
Ethics compliance certificate
Copyright transfer agreement
Procedural Guidelines
For policy-related inquiries and reporting:
Ethics Committee: ethics@rsynresearch.com
Technical Support: support@rsynresearch.com
Legal Department: legal@rsynresearch.com
Appeals Committee: appeals@rsynresearch.com
General Inquiries: info@rsynresearch.com
Appendices
Appendix A: Glossary of Terms
Appendix B: Investigation Flowcharts
Appendix C: Sample Documentation
Appendix D: Legal Framework
Appendix E: Technical Specifications
Legal Notice
This document represents the intellectual property of RSYN RESEARCH LLP and is protected under international copyright law. All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution is strictly prohibited.
End of Document